Context:
The play is full of paradox. Good and evil;
fair and foul; fate and freewill; everything has its opposite.
The production's decision was very much not to solve these
contradictions but to allow the opposites to co-exist. This
should make the play closer to the complexity of real life.
What do you think?
Shakespeare frequently uses antithesis where exact opposites are put together in the same line or thought.
